CCDems - San Luis Obispo County Democratic Party Blog

Feb6th

We live in the clouds

Why is it that average Americans are not as angry as we are about Republican obstruction in the U.S. Senate?  How could any Democrat be attracted to the specious argument that Democrats are responsible for getting little done in Congress?

Maybe it’s because only 26% of Americans know that it takes 60 votes to keep a filibuster from killing legislation!!

We activists live and breathe with how politics work, but we are out of touch with the vast majority of Americans when it comes to political knowledge. In short, we live in the clouds! A recent Pew Research study tested Americans about various issues and the results are truly shocking:  Here is the link to Pew   For example:

  • Only 26% knew it takes 60 senators to vote to stop a filibuster
  • Only 32% knew that the Chairman of the Republican National Committee is Michael Steele
  • Only 32% knew that not a single Republican voted to support health care legislation in the Senate
  • Only 36% knew that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is nearest to 10,000 and not 15,000 or 5,000
  • Only 39% knew that Harry Reid is the Senate Majority Leader

The Pew study breaks the answers down even further into gender, age, education, party affiliation, etc. Fascinating to read.  And you can even test yourself. Check it out.

Feb1st

Words that are killing us

It’s painful watching the Republican Party control the agenda of the media in a way that misleads enough voters act against their own best interests. It’s particularly painful to realize that as the majority party with a real agenda to help Americans that we cannot dominate the debate and point out the Republican responsibility for creating the mess.  The Republican Party is successful by being a 24-7 propaganda machine that plays on anger and fear with a nearly unified voice. And they have an actual blueprint for reaching their goal.

The Republican Party sets a goal - say killing healthcare - and then hires professionals to study how people can best be manipulated into being against the issue. One of the individuals they hire is a guy named Frank Luntz. And nine months ago he created a blueprint for killing healthcare that has in large measure been very successful.

Killing Financial Regulatory Reform  is their next goal. Once again they have hired Luntz to give them a blueprint. And that blueprint is now in our hands. Go to http://www.slocodems.org/wp/RepPlan2KillReform.pdf to see the actual Luntz blueprint.

Here is a list of works that you will hear over and over again from Republicans as they kill Financial Regulatory Reform:  ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY & OVERSIGHT, LOBBYIST LOOPHOLES, ENFORCEMENT OF CURRENT LAWS, BUREAUCRATS, WASTEFUL WASHINGTON SPENDING, NEVER AGAIN, GOVERNMENT FAILURES AND INCOMPETENCE, LET’S HELP SMALL BUSINESSES, BIG BANK BAILOUT BILL, BLOATED BUREACRACY, FINE PRINT, UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, SPECIAL INTERESTS, HARD WORKING TAXPAYERS, ANOTHER WASHINGTON AGENCY, UNLIMITED REGUATORY POWERS, DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS, &  RED TAPE.  Read the Luntz study to see the whole blueprint and understand why it will probably succeed.

What is distasteful in all of this is that honesty and morality play no part at all in how they reach their goal. And, of course, it is the very reason that we liberals are at a disadvantage. We actually like to be right on the issues and open in our dialogue about the issues. Meantime, the Republicans repeat their blueprint and shape the debate by getting folks upset, regardless of the actual merit of their position.

So, here’s my question: Why don’t we have and use a blueprint for shaping the debate ?

Jan22nd

Supreme Corporate Control Law

Representative Alan Grayson (D FL-8) has submitted 5 bills in immediate response to the Supreme Court Decision allowing unlimited corporate money to be spent to support or defeat any issue or candidate.

Here are links to the bills and a brief summary of their content:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4431
The Business Should Mind It’s Own Business Act - To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a 500 percent excise tax on corporate contributions to political committees and on corporate expenditures on political advocacy campaigns.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4432
The Corporate Propaganda Sunshine Act - To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its reporting requirements to require public companies to report certain expenditures made to influence public opinion on any matter other than the promotion of the company’s products or services.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4433
The Ending Corporate Collusion Act  - To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4434
The End Political Kickbacks Act - To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the ban on the making of contributions by certain government contractors to other for-profit recipients of Federal funds, to limit the amount of contributions the employees of for-profit recipients of Federal funds may make during any calendar year in which such funds are provided, and for other purposes.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4435
The Public Company Responsibility Act - To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued by a corporation unless the corporation’s registration with the exchange includes a certification that the corporation currently is in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which were in effect with respect to elections held during 2008.

Jan19th

Can You Hear Me NOW!??

Dear President Obama,

The voters of Massachusetts have sent a message - and it’s not “stay the course”

A little over a year ago we fought and voted for “Change We Can Believe In”

What we’ve received is “Compromise That Sucks!”

I know, I know.  Governing is more complicated than electioneering. But, what you have failed to understand is the depth of the desire for change and the impatience of most Americans. And you’ve surrounded yourself with the folks that are stuck inside “beltway-think” and who are way too self assured that the path to success is moving toward the Republican point of view. You carried Massachusetts by TWENTY SIX points just over a year ago - and those voters wanted change.  In their minds you have failed to deliver change and so now they have voted for change. AGAIN! Ted Kennedy is turning in his grave.

Your pursuit of “bipartisanship” is folly. It’s clear that no Republican will compromise with anything that our party stands for. (We spent weeks waiting for Olympia Snowe to come to the table.) And, while you have pursued bipartisanship, the Republicans have thrown every possible log in the path of progress. And now they don’t run as Republicans, but as anti-incumbents.  Yes, change is still alive in America, but Democrats are not delivering it and we can lose the best opportunity we may ever have if we don’t start taking names and kicking some butt -which is exactly what the voters STILL want.

You must alter course - and not in the direction that your closest advisers will point.

Here are some recommendations:

First, 51 votes is a majority in the Senate, not 60.  Bush never had 60 votes and he got almost everything he wanted through the Senate. Harry Reid miscalculated. And so did you.  Change this.  If it means getting a new Majority Leader, do it. Harry Reid probably won’t be there next year, anyway.

Second, stop relying on Rahm Emanuel. His brilliance was helpful when Democrats did not have a majority, but not now. Rahm is not the answer.  You need someone who connects with the voters and who will harness their anger, not someone who disdains them. I know this is painful, but you must do it to save your presidency.

Third, do the right things. Now. End “Don’t ask, don’t tell”. Close Guantanamo. The folks that feel strongly about these things are many and you need them. Our party needs them.

Almost all voters have very little idea of how complicated governance can be, but they are in charge -and they demand change. Please give it to them. Now.

Our hopes are still with you.

P.S. The title is a bit of a cheap shot, but I couldn’t resist.

Jul30th

CCDems is alive!

CCDems (Central Coast Democrats) Blog was born on July 30, 2007

We hope that your shared thoughts will stimulate and inspire others!